
This article compares Static Site Generation (SSG) and Server-Side Rendering (SSR) in Next.js applications, explaining when to use each approach and how to deploy them on AWS Amplify based on content frequency, performance needs, and personalization requirements.


<div><p>This article compares Static Site Generation (SSG) and Server-Side Rendering (SSR) in Next.js applications, helping developers choose the right approach for their use case.</p><ul><li>SSG pre-renders HTML at build time; ideal for static content with fast load times</li><li>SSR generates HTML on-demand per request; better for dynamic, personalized content</li><li>SSG offers speed and CDN scalability; SSR provides real-time data and personalization</li><li>Choose SSG for infrequent content updates; SSR for frequently changing dynamic content</li><li>SSG build times scale with page count; SSR has latency and scalability challenges</li><li>Both approaches deployable via AWS Amplify with example code provided</li><li>Next.js allows mixing SSG and SSR on different pages within same application</li></ul><p>The choice between SSG and SSR depends on content frequency, SEO needs, user experience requirements, and acceptable trade-offs between performance and dynamic functionality.</p></div>


Related articles