Ground truth curation and metric interpretation best practices for evaluating generative AI question answering using FMEval
Machine Learning Blog
This article discusses best practices for curating ground truth data and interpreting evaluation metrics when using FMEval to evaluate question answering generative AI pipelines.
Specifically, the article covers:
- Understanding the Factual Knowledge and QA Accuracy metrics in FMEval
- Best practices for curating ground truth data for Factual Knowledge and QA Accuracy
- Interpreting Factual Knowledge scores to detect hallucinations and retrieval issues
- Interpreting QA Accuracy metrics like recall, precision, and F1 to assess closeness and conciseness to ground truth
- Using ground truth curation and metric interpretation in an iterative flywheel process to improve the golden dataset and evaluation process
- Key takeaways on balancing ground truth curation with metric interpretation for effective evaluation
The AWS News Feed is currently looking for gold sponsors. If you want to support the AWS community and reach a large audience of AWS professionals, consider sponsoring the AWS News Feed.
Related articles
Mar 5
2025
2025
Ground truth generation and review best practices for evaluating generative AI question-answering with FMEval
Aug 14
2024
2024
A qualitative approach to Evaluating Large Language Models for Responsible Gen AI on AWS
Sep 12
2024
2024
Enabling production-grade generative AI: New capabilities lower costs, streamline production, and boost security
Sep 10
2024
2024
Generative AI as a force for good in facilitating cyber-resiliency in public sector organizations
The AWS News Feed is currently looking for silver sponsors. If you want to support the AWS community and reach a large audience of AWS professionals, consider sponsoring the AWS News Feed.